Kane

really cautiously? lol

first time in ages since i seen kane do the tombstone

Hornswoggle

nah i think

kelly might use Kane to take out both tag champions so when they defend their titles next they will lose the match and titles to kelly kellys boyfriend who is on the other team

tomko before he left wwe he had a feud with Kane maybe wwe are going to continue this feud when he comes back as he wrestled a dark match last raw

santino about a month ago he was talking to someone on the phone we never fount out who might be kelly kelly

batista and kelly kelly had a little feud together against beth and santino maybe batista saved kelly kelly because he's her boyfriend

Bosch you're forgetting this is WWE, consistency is a banned word in that company.

good shout with tomko lad

Junior wrote:

Doomhammer wrote:

Junior wrote:

I know it sounds dumb, but prehaps we get a kelly kelly heel turn? She uses kane to take out people she "dating" and in the process sets herself up for a title shot
===
*sigh*

only 12th tiem its been sugested nm though its the thought of half turning on those 3 brain cells that count...chin up! lad

something wrong with my expressing my opinion on the situation?

sure as hell seems to be something wrong with your keyboard...

no just when its been said 20 times u jerk and there seems to be something wrong with you brain......oh youre american..sorry slipps my mind.

grats on insult?

i do like how you can't be bothered to get the spelling errors out of a post responding to one claiming you suck at spelling.

That being said, you did the same thing I did.... then proceeded to yell at me for doing it?

its coz junior cant spell

JUNIOR! GET A LATE MESSAGE OUT TO SANTA (if he can understand it) THAT YOU WANT A SPELL CHECKER FOR YOUR PC FOR CHRISTMAS!

lol

poor kid

Is that the 3rd or 4th time youve used that joke pabs i forget....twat....

dont get arsey with pablo cos he made a joke.

ur so tightly wound mate, its christmas

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A45186320

WTF? Either someone hacked into WWE.com somehow or this is another work that begins on wwe.com ala Jeff Hardy but there is no way Kane would have been released! Maybe WWE were thinking of doing a storyline where Kane was sacked for his actions last week however, he keeps turning up and causing chaos even though he doesn't (kayfabe) have a job with WWE anymore.

Iv not heard anything at all, I doubt he would be released though but like you say he could get kayfabe fired, first iv saw it though, whats the poster on 606 like? is he a wum or a genuine wrestling poster

He is a bit of a Kane pervert, take a look at his article history, 4 or 5 articles all starting with simply 'Kane'

I don't think he is a WUM but he doesn't post in the wrestling section much. I think he is a mark but like you, this is the first I heard about it. Apparently, there was an article on wwe.com about Kane's release but it got removed so I presumed someone had hacked into wwe.com but I thought that would be highly monitered and protected.

I guess if we don't see him at all tonight and there is no explanation for his absence, I think he may have been released after all. If he has been released which I very much doubt, he must have done something really bad considering he only started a new storyline last week and is still a big star in WWE, I think Kane is held in slightly higher regard than the likes of Kenny Dykstra or Lance Cade.

EDIT Kane Pervet Like I said, I think he is just a Kane mark and wants to know if this is true or not.

Could be just a promotion by WWE to get people to watch RAW tonight?

I only call kids who don't know any better a mark

This guy alledgedly has children so if he is old enough to have Kids that play for football teams he is a Kane pervert

Nothing is on any NewZZZZ sites about Kane, even if it was only up for a few minutes someone would have noticed it and reported it

I might ask for a link to the wwe.com article on 606 and see if anyone replies. Worth a try.

Plus the guy who said he saw the article seems like a genuine poster so...

They are basically doing the same storyline as Kane and Lita. Why don't WWE understand that Kane is suppose to be a monster and go back to the days of masked kane. They should put him in an accident where he badly burns his face and therefore has to wear the mask again. Then he can run riot throughout the WWE once again

Was it ever actually explained why he wasn't burned?

JohnReid1 wrote:

They are basically doing the same storyline as Kane and Lita. Why don't WWE understand that Kane is suppose to be a monster and go back to the days of masked kane. They should put him in an accident where he badly burns his face and therefore has to wear the mask again. Then he can run riot throughout the WWE once again

So how many times is Kane going to get burned in his life and have to wear a mask

You are having a moan because they are doing the same story with him thats already been done then you want to rectify that by doing the exact same angle that allegedly brought him to the WWF

Discopants wrote:

Was it ever actually explained why he wasn't burned?

I don't think so, I always thought he had escaped the fire but I don't think he did. I remember when he took his mask off, he had lots of fake burns, then the very next week, he had no scars or burns, nothing.

Wasn't it Taker who caused the fire?

Only according to Paul Bearer lol.

Oh, I can never follow these type of stories in wrestling anyway. They get too complicated lol. Also, why can Kane speak perfectly fine now, yet when he was in a feud with Austin, he had to use a machine to speak? Your voicebox doesn't repair itself after a few years lol, does it?

The Undertaker was supposidely the arsonist and Kane was caught in the fire, Taker thought for years that he was dead but Bearer was hiding him away all that time, I think they said Takers mum died in that fire

If you ask me then she was asking for trouble anyway, when you call your kids Kane and The Undertaker then what do you expect

And then marrying Paul Bearer

Geesh, what a bint she must've been.