Worst 10 WWE World Champions ever?

Basically I saw this format on another forum, you all send me your ten votes for the worst WWE World Champions ever. It can be based on pretty much anything, that person, that particular reign.

Put them in order so that I can give points for whatever position they are in and then I will reveal them in a couple of weeks one at a time.

I'll give a week to send your votes to me by PM, 1st will get 10 points, 2nd 9 points in your list and so on. And we'll see who is voted the top ten worst wwe world champions ever!

P.S. The ECW Championships will only count until the McMahon reign where I feel it wasn't a world title after that.

Does WWF count?

Yeah.

PM'ed

I meant PM me Gaffer so then basically the results won't be obvious. I've copied them down, wanna edit your post.

Sorry for the confusion.

Apologies, just read your P.S

If only WCW counted, they had some shockingly bad World Champs.

So far I have had gaffer's results.

And one guy from bosch (I haven't counted that I'll wait until you send me them all.)

From three votes (gaffers, gunmans, and my own.) there is a clear run away leader, then a gap between 2nd and third and the''re all pretty close from there.

We need more votes!

*bump*

shit forgot i'll do mine now

Got Disco's and Boschs. Two run away leaders with it being close in the middle.

pmd you

I've PM'd C4lum and Grecian.

I'll give two days for any more votes, so until Saturday and then I'll start to release the names. Obvious leader at the moment, doubt he'll lose now.

Second is far ahead, big gap between 3rd and 4th. Then all pretty close from there.

Bob Backlund better not win this, he's a misunderstood genius!

nah Batista will win it

Dr. Oznog wrote:

Bob Backlund better not win this, he's a misunderstood genius!

I definitely didn't vote for him, I gave him the benefit of the doubt for his reign from 78-83 which I never saw, but assume he must have been doing something right. Also I don't take into account overly short reigns, as I think it's unfair to judge somebody on that.

I'll confess, I did actually put Backlund on my list (at number 7, or something around there) for his short reign back in the mid 90's - purely because that reflected how utterly shite WWF was at the time, that I detested his character, the way he won the title from Bret and losing it in seconds to Diesel (who also made my list) was put very bluntly, an awful booking decision, and now means he's actually more remembered for that than the 5 year reign in the 80's.

Yeah that's very true Grecian, I had actually considered puting him on my list because of that, but decided judging reigns like that and Kane's was maybe a bit harsh as it wasn't long enough to get an idea of how they would have done as champ if given at least a couple of months.

thegunman84 wrote:

Yeah that's very true Grecian, I had actually considered puting him on my list because of that, but decided judging reigns like that and Kane's was maybe a bit harsh as it wasn't long enough to get an idea of how they would have done as champ if given at least a couple of months.

Another thing is, there have been good world champions, but some have had really shit reigns. Hogan's after Mania IX or Jericho's Undisputed reign are both balls for instance. But Hogan's other stuff probably negates that. Jericho's other shit was good too.

Thing is though Oz, Jericho has now had 3 World title reigns, and none of them have been booked well at all, which is shocking considering he's one of the most talented performers on the WWE roster.

Yeah but at least in the other 2 he wasn't reduced to walking the dog, so they're more acceptable than that Undisputed crap.