Does TNA live up to its name?

For the most part we tend to judge and compare TNA to either of the WWE shows, primarily Raw as this is the companies flagship show.

Do you think we should do this?

TNA stands for Total Nonstop Action and there is certainly more happens in an episode of Impact than either Raw or Smackdown, not necessarily more wrestling, but more progression in storylines.

TNA haven't built a reputation on producing solid 15-20 minute matches, for that you should watch ROH. TNA as a whole is meant to be a non stop rollercoaster ride with unpredictable twists and turns throughout the show.

So, on the whole, do TNA live up to their name? Total Nonstop Action.

Bobby Roode wrote:

For the most part we tend to judge and compare TNA to either of the WWE shows, primarily Raw as this is the companies flagship show.

Do you think we should do this?.

I really don't think they should and its the one thing that annoys me most about the company and their fans.

Instead of comparing it to RAW, they need to compare it to Impact. What I mean by that is, they should be looking at there own show to constantly improve and strive to be better, at the moment they strive to be WWE98 and are looking pretty stupid doing it.

Right before Hogan came in TNA just about deserve its name, now though it doesn't.

IMO before people have a heart attack.

it should be changed to tnp.total non stop promos.(that was bad)they have an average of twenty minutes of wrestling on there show and the rest is promos and backstage interviews so no they dont live up to there name

based on two episodes 8)

No based on two months.

But hey, because TNA do more promos now the definition of "action"(in a wrestling sense) can be changed right?